Roll-call vote · 8 July 2026

Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets

After recital G

Part of: 2026/2680(DEA) · first reading
Rejected
For 190Against 464Abstain 3

This is the vote on Amendment 2. We record the outcome and the full roll-call below — but not the amendment’s wording: what it proposed to change isn’t in our data yet (it lives in the tabled-amendment documents, which we don’t ingest).

How the vote split

for · against · abstain

By political group

PPE2·169·2
S-D0·126·0
ECR73·0·0
PFE73·0·0
RENEW0·70·0
VERTS-ALE0·48·0
THE-LEFT0·40·0
NI16·9·1
ESN26·0·0

By country

Germany14·76·1
France28·42·0
Italy31·34·2
Poland26·27·0
Spain6·46·0
Romania7·22·0
Netherlands9·18·0
Belgium5·16·0
Sweden2·18·0

Every vote cast

655 recorded positions
Download CSVShowing 1–10 of 655
Abir AL-SAHLANIRENEW · SWEAgainst
Adam BIELANECR · POLFor
Adam JARUBASPPE · POLAgainst
Adina VĂLEANPPE · ROUAgainst
Adnan DIBRANIS-D · SWEAgainst
Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARAPPE · ESPAgainst
Alberico GAMBINOECR · ITAFor
Alessandra MORETTIS-D · ITAAgainst