Roll-call vote · 8 July 2026

Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets

After recital M

Part of: 2026/2680(DEA) · first reading
Rejected
For 204Against 455Abstain 3

This is the vote on Amendment 3. We record the outcome and the full roll-call below — but not the amendment’s wording: what it proposed to change isn’t in our data yet (it lives in the tabled-amendment documents, which we don’t ingest).

How the vote split

for · against · abstain

By political group

PPE14·159·1
S-D0·122·0
ECR75·0·0
PFE74·0·0
RENEW0·73·0
VERTS-ALE0·49·0
THE-LEFT0·40·0
NI15·11·2
ESN26·0·0

By country

Germany14·77·1
France33·39·0
Italy33·33·1
Poland26·27·0
Spain8·42·0
Romania7·22·0
Netherlands9·19·0
Belgium6·16·0
Greece4·16·0

Every vote cast

661 recorded positions
Download CSVShowing 1–10 of 661
Abir AL-SAHLANIRENEW · SWEAgainst
Adam BIELANECR · POLFor
Adam JARUBASPPE · POLAgainst
Adina VĂLEANPPE · ROUAgainst
Adnan DIBRANIS-D · SWEAgainst
Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARAPPE · ESPAgainst
Alberico GAMBINOECR · ITAFor
Alessandra MORETTIS-D · ITAAgainst